A Little Irritated

If you noticed the date of my last contemplation you might ask, "Where have you been?" Well, I grew tired of blogging. No, actually, I just ran out of things I wanted to say. Or, perhaps it was that I had said enough. I'm not totally convinced I have more to say but we'll see.

What hasn't changed is the thought of a hot, steamy cup of coffee that gets me out of bed each morning. For years now we have found nothing better than an offering from Central Market, brewed by a company in San Antonio, called "Dallas Blend".  Stumbled across it, like I said, several years ago, tried a few others from time to time but keep coming back.

Contemplation goes best with coffee, so, get your cup and lets go.

Drove by a beautiful church the other day. The architecture reminds me of something in Europe only with a modern touch. Must admit I've admired it jealously for sometime. Whitestone sign out front bears its name under which is the identifier, “Bible Church".

Don't know exactly why but on this particular occasion I found this a little irritating. Could be the combination of a television advertisement I saw for a church proclaiming in a snobbish tone, "We teach the Bible".  This should go without saying but the implication was clear, "We alone are the sole possessors of Biblical truth."

Now if you know anything about religious history you understand that no matter what flavor of faith practice people adhere to, the name of that flavor is only the beginning. Within that religious identifier will be a variety of divisions founded on some nuance of holy guidance originated by an ancient saint within that tradition.  In my religious preference, of which I am most familiar, there are no less than three hundred such branches. And, within each of these branches there are varieties of understandings that can be placed randomly on an ever evolving line from conservative to progressive; all of which are based on the same holy texts.

Seems preposterous to me for anyone to claim exclusive rights to holy truth. Which is likely at the root of many who have decided rather than choosing this or that flavor of faith to simply opt out with the claim of being "spiritual". Which I'm not sure exactly what that means but likely the intent being that you don't define it therefore you can't argue with what it is or isn't. It is vague enough to allow for self-definition and give ample room to roam wherever one might feel directed.


-->
So, who then does decide what is the truth on which life can be based? The answer is not as hard as it might seem but will take another cup of coffee, or two. Get yours but stay tuned.
















Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Enlightenment

We can talk while the coffee's brewing. Not quite a century later Peter Abelard objected to Anselm’s 12th century interpretation of how it is that Jesus’ death saves the world. Abelard thought he had a better idea and believed what Jesus did was show that we could live at a higher level of human kindness than previously accepted. The love of Jesus portrays not only the supreme love God has for us but becomes the inspiration for the love we can have for God and for our neighbor. Abelard’s “moral influence” theory has been judged by history as being a bit too optimistic as the following centuries did not produce the inspirational change in lives it proposed. So even though Anselm’s theory of Jesus being our substitute was slightly wounded it lived on as the most prevalent view of how Jesus saves. Not until the 19th and 20th century when cultural influences from the enlightenment spurred renewed debate have other weighty theories begun to emerge. Swedish theologian Gustaf Aulen challe...
Read more

This Should Come With A Warning Label

Ummm. That coffee really smells good this early in the morning. Grab your cup. Let’s take a new look at that old adage, “Jesus Saves”. You realize, of course, my reason for writing is to see how my understanding works with those of you who are involved in the same search for making sense of this in a fast changing world of reason. I should warn you that in no way am I in the same game with some of the theologians and writers I’ve cited. In fact, most of my own understanding has come from reading and hopefully absorbing a tiny amount of their wisdom. And, I keep reading and searching for better ways to understand and express my faith. My understanding is in a constant state of evolution. Along the way I realized that the expression, “Jesus Saves” was raising other questions for me: “From what exactly is it that Jesus saves?” And, “What does Jesus provide that makes this happen?” Other issues and questions surface as well but these will likely take us to the bottom of this pot of cof...
Read more

If I Had A Hammer

Wow, that's a big cup you have? Okay, back to the why question. Darwin’s theory identifies in the evolution of species the idea that suffering is an integral part of creation’s development. We know that when DNA replicates there often occurs gene abnormalities and mutations referred to as “errors”. From these, amounting to no more than slight differences, comes either better fitness for survival or lesser fitness prone to extinction. The better fitted characteristics survive, the lesser suffer against their environment and eventually perish. The evil we call suffering is literally part of the process of survival. It is important to make note of this insight because it negates a long standing, primitive human trait to feel that when a disaster happens it is because some deserving judgment has been rendered on the guilty. Knowing suffering is part of the process of life refutes the assumption such suffering is the result of mistakes in a previous life, a parent’s sins becoming the ...
Read more